FORMATION À ÉVITER. ECOLE À ÉVITER. TBS EDUCATION À ÉVITER

Avis de Buefdpgn_17323 - MSc Communication & Brand Content - TBS Education

  • Quel est, selon vous, le principal atout de ce programme ?

    None.


  • Quelle est, selon vous, la principale faiblesse de ce programme ?

    All of the program.


  • Commentaires généraux

    So this program really affected my mental health. This school killed my stamina. It is such a disappointment to be part of it.

Évaluation générale - MSc Communication & Brand Content à TBS Education

1.1610

Moyenne générale

1.810

Pédagogie du programme

110

International

110

Vie étudiante

110

Réseau et insertion professionnelle

110

Retour sur investissement

  • 110

    Contenu académique du programme

    No. poor content. poor way of putting the content into practice. repetitive tasks. No call to innovation. No call to creativity. No call to exploring our soft and hard skills. Courses and content not updated to now's era.

  • 510

    Moyens pédagogiques (bibliothèque, WIFI, locaux)

    Well the only positive aspect is we had internet and heaters. But for computers you cannot put just 6 computers and 3 printers for thousands of students.

  • 110

    Qualité des professeurs permanents

    I would say along this year I had a maximum of 3 great professors out of 30 professors. The difference is felt between scholars and just a "good human" capital that did good professionally. A scholar knows how to convey a course, is pretty aware of academia and its art. Someone who's professionally great, that's good for him. But it doesn't necessarily mean that he's good, capable enough of translating his "experience" into a course that students "can" understand. Plus, most of the professors can't speak English, and are required to teach in English.

  • 110

    Qualité des intervenants professionnels extérieurs

    No. very disappointing. For a business school as TBS. It's quite not matching whatever you claim your quality education to be.

  • 110

    Contrôle des connaissances, volume et répartition des cours, travail personnel

    No. This year long master could have been thought in 2 weeks. Repetitive content, we spent the whole first semester tackling the same subject all over again each week. So the first semester could have been thought in a week. and the second semester in another week.

  • 110

    Reconnaissance internationale du programme

  • 110

    Accompagnement/aide si départ à l'étranger

  • 110

    Services aux étudiants (orientation, projet pro., scolarité, etc.)

  • 110

    Ambiance, cohésion dans la promo (projets, entraide, loisirs, associations)

  • 110

    Ville étudiante, logement (coût, accès, situation)

  • 110

    Réseau des anciens, contacts professionnels

    I don't know what that means. Network?

  • 110

    Qualité du directeur de programme et notoriété de la formation

  • 110

    Stages et aide à l'insertion professionnelle

    No, I have been applying through the job teaser since February. No interviews. No calls. Just rejection emails.

  • 110

    Êtes-vous globalement satisfait de votre formation ?

  • 110

    Referiez-vous le même choix de formation aujourd’hui ?

    No I would certainly not. Most of the professors are incompetent, they're teaching subjects they're not updated on. And they're teaching in english while they cannot speak english. The content of the master is worth of a first year at a university.

Commentaires

Derniers avis publiés